7 books = 8 movies. goddammit.
Mar. 12th, 2008 10:58 pmit's official: harry potter and the deathly hallows will be two films: harry potter and the deathly hallows, part one and harry potter and the deathly hallows part two. hey, i've got a better idea for the names. how about, harry potter an the deathly hallows, and harry potter and the producer's golden toilet.
that's just fkn ridiculous. if you can chop the other books down...hell. if you can chop GOF and OOTP to one film each, you sure as hell can chop down DH into one. it IS possible, no matter how much anyone argues how much is in there. it is possible.
and, because it is possible, the making of two films is just stupid. and greedy. and raises all kinds of questions regarding actor contracts. i'm assuming they got most of the stars to say yes, because announcing two films before you've re-negotiated contracts of your 7-film regulars is just amazingly stupid. you know what...i'm SURE they've re-negotiated, because there doesn't exist a producer stupid enough to split it in two before all actors are go.
now we're just waiting for a director. yates said he's thinking about it, but that was before the split. i dunno, after curon, he's the best one so far. but i kind of like the tradition of trying out new people. but now you've got two...what are you going to do? split it up between two directors or find a director willing to sign on for two? great planning, warner brothers.
j.k. ended so nicely. now the WB's gounna go fk it up in the name of cashing in. i guess, as a fan, i just feel that it was a good enough of a finale to be on par with the other books, and you can make a good enough end to the films in just the same way as the other films. it's not like DH alone was the epic fantasy of all time that it deserves the double-film treatment (i won't even get into my 2-film hobbit gripes), i mean, it's not fkn dr. zhavago, fersnapessakes. it's a 7 part fantasy. it should remain 7 parts.
rant done.
that's just fkn ridiculous. if you can chop the other books down...hell. if you can chop GOF and OOTP to one film each, you sure as hell can chop down DH into one. it IS possible, no matter how much anyone argues how much is in there. it is possible.
and, because it is possible, the making of two films is just stupid. and greedy. and raises all kinds of questions regarding actor contracts. i'm assuming they got most of the stars to say yes, because announcing two films before you've re-negotiated contracts of your 7-film regulars is just amazingly stupid. you know what...i'm SURE they've re-negotiated, because there doesn't exist a producer stupid enough to split it in two before all actors are go.
now we're just waiting for a director. yates said he's thinking about it, but that was before the split. i dunno, after curon, he's the best one so far. but i kind of like the tradition of trying out new people. but now you've got two...what are you going to do? split it up between two directors or find a director willing to sign on for two? great planning, warner brothers.
j.k. ended so nicely. now the WB's gounna go fk it up in the name of cashing in. i guess, as a fan, i just feel that it was a good enough of a finale to be on par with the other books, and you can make a good enough end to the films in just the same way as the other films. it's not like DH alone was the epic fantasy of all time that it deserves the double-film treatment (i won't even get into my 2-film hobbit gripes), i mean, it's not fkn dr. zhavago, fersnapessakes. it's a 7 part fantasy. it should remain 7 parts.
rant done.